Soziologie - Tag [forschung]
Dr. Jule Adriaans gewinnt Peter A. Berger Preis der DGS-Sektion Soziale Ungleichheit und Sozialstrukturanalyse
Jule Adriaans erhält für Ihre kumulative Dissertation "Distributive Justice: Definition, Determinants, and Consequences of the Justice of Earnings" den Peter A. Berger Preis 2024 der Sektion "Soziale Ungleichheit und Sozialstrukturanalyse" der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie. Die Preisverleihung findet im September 2024 im Rahmen der Herbsttagung der Sektion an der Universität zu Köln statt.
In Ihrer Arbeit entwickelt Jule Adriaans eine konzeptionelle und
empirische Abgrenzung der Einkommensgerechtigkeit als
strukturell-eingebettete, subjektive Bewertung, die zwischen
Ungleichheiten und deren individuellen Folgen vermittelt. Die
einzelnen Kapitel der Dissertationsschrift sind in European
Societies, European
Sociological Review,
Social Psychology Quarterly und Social Justice
Research erschienen.
Official Inauguration of DFG-funded Research Training Group on "Cross-Border Labour Markets" RTG 2951
On April 8, the newly established Research Training Group "Cross-Border Labour Markets: transnational market makers, infrastructures, institutions" RTG 2951 was officially inaugurated with a Launch Event at Bielefeld University. Speaker Ursula Mense-Petermann (Professor of Economic Sociology and Sociology of Work, Bielefeld University) and Co-speaker Karen Shire (Professor of Comparative Sociology and Japanese Society, University Duisburg-Essen) welcomed the 11 Principal Investigators from Bielefeld University, University Duisburg-Essen, and University Osnabrück, as well as the group of 11 newly appointed doctoral researchers, one Postdoc, as well as two associated researchers to the Research Training Group.
The Research Training Group investigates cross-border labour markets and the transnational organizations, infrastructures, and institutions that facilitate and stabilize such labour markets extending beyond national boundaries.
The rector of Bielefeld University, Professor Angelika Epple, congratulated the international and interdisciplinary team of PIs for their success and praised their commitment and determination in this highly innovative project.
Keynotes were given by sociologist and migration scholar Ludger Pries (Ruhr University Bochum) and by labour market economist Michele Battisti (University of Glasgow), thus representing the interdisciplinary outlook of the RTG.
[Weiterlesen]DFG-funded Research Training Group on "Cross-Border Labour Markets" starts its work
Call for Papers: "Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Neuroenhancement: Current Developments and Impact on the Individual and Society" in Bielefeld
Conference Date: December 10-12, 2024
Location: Bielefeld University, Center for Interdisciplinary Research, ZiF), Bielefeld, Germany
Submission deadline: April 15th, 2024
Organizers:
o Dr. Sebastian Sattler (Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, GER)
o Prof. Dr. Saskia Nagel (Department for Society, Technology, and Human Factors, RWTH Aachen University, GER)
o Dr. Dimitris Repantis (Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Berlin, GER)
o Prof. Dr. Guido Mehlkop (Faculty of Economics, Law and Social Sciences; Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour, University of Erfurt, GER)
Keynote speakers:
o Dr. Caterina Cinel (School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering (CSEE), University of Essex, UK)
o Prof. Dr. Marcello Ienca (School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, GER)
o Prof. Dr. Ty Schepis (Department of Psychology, Texas State University, USA)
o Prof. Dr. Anna Wexler (Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, USA)
Topic:
We are on the verge of many pioneering activities and scientific breakthroughs concerning brain-computer interfaces, brain stimulation, and neurochemicals, that have the potential to go beyond the treatment of diseases to enhance cognitive performance in work, education, and leisure. At the same time, societal processes such as the quest for self-optimization or transformations in and outside of the labor market (e.g., digitalization, increasing stress, and cognitive demands) may create the desire, but also the pressure, to use such neuroenhancement. These developments require the attention of an interdisciplinary dialog. The conference aims to unravel the inherent complexity of neuroenhancement by bringing together ethicists, sociologists, psychologists, engineers, pharmacologists, neuroscientists, political scientists, and legal scholars. By fostering interdisciplinary exchange, we aim to illuminate the multifaceted dimensions of neuroenhancement and facilitate future collaborations.
Information about abstract submission and further details:
Please submit your abstract via e-mail to: enhance.conference@uni-bielefeld.de
Please use the abstract style sheet on the conference homepage (LINK).
Conference homepage: Please click on this LINK.
Travel support: We will provide travel support.
[Weiterlesen]New Publication by Dr. Sattler et al. on Measuring Complete Well-Being and Human Flourishing
Sattler, S., Wilkinson, R., Lee, M. T. (2023). Eine kurze und umfassende Messung des subjektiven Wohlergehens - Eine bevölkerungsbasierte Validierung der deutschen Version der Human Flourishing Scale bestehend aus dem Flourish Index (FI) und dem Secure Flourish Index (SFI). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). LINK=https://doi.org/10.6102/zis333_exz
We developed a German version of the Human Flourishing Scale (Flourish Index, FI and Secure Flourish Index, SFI) in a multi-stage translation and scale testing process to measure distinct domains of subjective well-being and overall flourishing. The FI consists of five sub-domains: happiness and life satisfaction, physical and mental health, meaning and purpose, character and virtue, and close social relationships. The SFI adds the sub-domain financial and material stability, which is thought necessary to sustain the other domains over time. The twelve-item SFI is a measure of flourishing that is short enough to be practical in a variety of settings, including in the workplace and in population surveys. It is comprehensive in its assessment of the most essential domains of “complete” well-being.
New Paper by Moya, Sattler and Sauer on Double Standards in the Labor Market when Violating the Social Norm of Vaccination
Moya, C., Sattler, S., Taflinger, S., Sauer, C. (2024): Examining
double standards in layoff preferences and expectations for
gender, age, and ethnicity when violating the social norm of
vaccination. Scientific Reports
14: 39. [Link]
Abstract
Whether vaccination refusal is perceived as a social norm
violation that affects layoff decisions has not been tested.
Also unknown is whether ascribed low-status groups are subject
to double standards when they violate norms, experiencing
stronger sanctions in layoff preferences and expectations, and
whether work performance attenuates such sanctioning. Therefore,
we study layoff preferences and expectations using a discrete
choice experiment within a large representative online survey in
Germany (N=12,136). Respondents chose between two
employee profiles, each with information about ascribed
characteristics signaling different status groups (gender, age,
and ethnicity), work performance (work quality and quantity, and
social skills), and whether the employees refused to vaccinate
against COVID-19. We found that employees who refused
vaccination were more likely to be preferred and expected to be
laid off. Respondents also expected double standards regarding
layoffs due to vaccination refusal, hence, harsher treatment of
females and older employees. Nonetheless, their preferences did
not reflect such double standards. We found little support that
high work performance attenuates these sanctions and double
standards, opening questions about the conditions under which
social biases arise. Our results suggest detrimental
consequences of vaccination refusal for individuals, the labor
market, and acceptance of health policies.
New Paper by Sebastian Sattler on the How Terrorist Attacks Impact Drinking
Pradel, F., Sattler, S. (2023): Health Consequences of a Death Threat: How Terrorist Attacks Impact Drinking. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. [Link]
Terrorist attacks, war, violent acts, and their media coverage remind us of our own mortality, which may provoke stress and coping mechanisms. The terror management health model (TMHM) proposes that even subliminal thoughts about existential threats trigger worldview defense and self-esteem-related behaviors. Based on the TMHM, our field experiment (N=228) examines the impact of a terrorist attack on death-thought accessibility, the choice between alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages, and if the impact on this choice is moderated by the importance of alcohol to one's self-esteem (i.e., alcohol-based self-esteem), and the consciousness of the terrorist attack. Results show that thoughts about the terrorist attack increased death-thought accessibility. The salience of the terrorist attack had no main effect on beverage choice, but alcohol-based self-esteem predicted choosing an alcoholic beverage. However, in the unconscious thought condition, participants who had low alcohol-based self-esteem and were provoked with death-related thoughts about terrorism were more likely to choose an alcoholic beverage. In the conscious thought condition, participants who had high alcohol-based self-esteem were less likely to choose alcohol. This study suggests that thoughts about terrorism and, therefore, the threat of death, can be provoked in everyday situations and affect substance use behaviors with potentially adverse health consequences.
New paper on the adherence to behavioral measures against the spread of COVID-19
Sattler, S., Taflinger, S., Ernst, A., Hasselhorn, F. (2024). Ein moderiertes Mediationsmodell zur Erklärung der Beziehung zwischen Risikogruppenzugehörigkeit, Wahrnehmung der Bedrohung, Wissen und Einhaltung der COVID-19-Verhaltensmaßnahmen. Pp. 33-69, in: Henzler, I., Hues, H., Sonnleitner, S., Wilkens, U. (eds.), Extended Views. Gesellschafts- und wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf die COVID-19-Pandemie (Köln: Böhlau) Übersetzung aus dem Englischen von: doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.842368.
Background: COVID-19 is a threat to individual and global health, thus, reducing the disease’s spread is of significant importance. However, adherence to behavioral measures against the spread of COVID-19 is not universal, even within vulnerable populations who are at higher risk of exposure to the virus or severe COVID-19 infection. Therefore, this study investigates how risk-group membership relates to adherence to COVID-19 behavioral measures, whether perceived threat of COVID-19 is a mechanism explaining this relationship, and whether knowledge about COVID-19 moderates these effects. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey (N = 4,096) representative of the adult population in Germany with regard to gender, age (18 to 74), and province. Therein, we assessed risk group membership with two indicators (risk of exposure to COVID-19 and risk of severe COVID-19 infection), perceived COVID-19 threat with the Perceived Coronavirus Threat Questionnaire, knowledge about COVID-19 with a knowledge test; and adherence to six behavioral measures to protect against the spread of COVID-19 (e.g., keeping distance, using mouth-nose protection, and following contact restrictions). We used moderated mediation models to test whether perceived threat mediates the relationship between risk-group membership and adherence and whether knowledge about COVID-19 moderates this relationship.
New paper on the impact of COVID 19 on sleep
ABSTRACT
Das wahrgenommene Risiko einer COVID-19-Exposition und eines
schweren COVID-19-Verlaufs beeinträchtigt den Schlaf: Die
mediierenden und moderierenden Rollen von Ängstlichkeit und Wissen
in Bezug auf COVID-19
Zerbini, G., Taflinger, S., Reicherts, P., Kunz, M., Sattler, S.
(2024): Das wahrgenommenen Risiko einer COVID-19-Exposition und
eines schweren COVID-19-Verlaufs beeinträchtigen den Schlaf: Die
mediierende und moderierende Rolle von COVID-19-bezogenen Ängsten
und Wissen. Pp. 71-95, in: Henzler, I., Hues, H., Sonnleitner, S.,
Wilkens, U. (eds.), Extended Views. Gesellschafts- und
wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf die
COVID-19-Pandemie (Köln: Böhlau). Übersetzung aus dem
Englischen von: doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13569
Abstract
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has been linked to increased levels
of stress, depression, and anxiety in many people around the
world. Therefore, identifying individuals at risk of psychosocial
burden during this unprecedented crisis is essential for
developing prevention measures and treatment options for mental
health issues. To this aim, we investigated two risk groups:
individuals at higher risk of exposure to the virus and
individuals at higher risk of poor prognosis if they contract the
virus. We conducted a survey (N = 4,167) with a representative
sample of the German population and assessed perceived risk of
COVID-19 exposure and poor prognosis if infected, COVID-19-related
anxiety, problems with sleep and daytime functioning, as well as
self-reported knowledge about the disease. Results showed that
perceived risk group membership was linked to increased problems
with sleep and daytime functioning via elevated levels of
COVID-19-related anxiety. This mediated effect was further
moderated by self-reported COVID-19 knowledge, but only for
individuals who rated themselves at higher risk of COVID-19
exposure. Thus, knowledge buffered the negative effect of exposure
risk on anxiety and ultimately on sleep in this risk group.
Reaching individuals at increased risk of exposure with clear
information about the disease, how to prevent infection, and
treatment options could be an effective strategy to contain
anxiety levels and promote good sleep, which is important for
general well-being.
New paper on measuring complete subjective well-being with the Flourish Index (FI) and the Secure Flourish Index (SFI)
Sattler, S., Wilkinson, R., & Lee, M. T. (2023). A Brief Measure of Complete Subjective Well-Being in Germany: A Population-Based Validation of a German Version of the Flourish Index (FI) and the Secure Flourish Index (SFI). PLOS One 18(11): e0284892. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284892.
ABSTRACT
Measuring subjective well-being in a multidimensional, valid, reliable, and parsimonious way is important for both social science research and social policy. Here, we present an efficient measure of distinct domains of subjective well-being and overall flourishing. The Flourishing Index (FI) consists of five sub-domains: 1. happiness and life satisfaction, 2. physical and mental health, 3. meaning and purpose, 4. character and virtue, and 5. close social relationships. The Secure Flourishing Index (SFI) adds the sub-domain financial and material stability, which is thought to be necessary to sustain the other domains over time. We developed a German version of these measures in a multi-stage translation and scale testing process. The results of an exploratory factor analysis in Study 1 (N = 192) suggest a unidimensional structure of the FI and a two-dimensional structure of the SFI. Moreover, both indices (and most sub-domains) revealed acceptable to good reliability. The factor structures were confirmed in Study 2 (N = 13,268). We provide indications for measurement invariance of both indices with regard to gender and age. We furthermore examined inter-correlations with related constructs such as importance of health, self-efficacy, and social support. Study 3 (N = 317) finds evidence for high convergent validity of both the FI and the SFI with overall well-being as well as sub-scores of the PERMA-Profiler. These results suggest that the FI and the SFI are efficient measures of distinct domains of subjective well-being and overall flourishing. Our translation of the FI and SFI, along with the empirical relationships that we found among the measures that we reviewed, will help scholars in Germany (and beyond) explore an expanded range of domains of well-being, including the comparatively neglected domains of character and virtue, physical health, and financial and material stability.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft fördert neues Graduiertenkolleg
Zu Wanderarbeiter*innen, Expatriates oder auch Grenzpendler*innen wird bisher meist nur erforscht, was ihre Ein- oder Auswanderung für die betroffenen nationalen Arbeitsmärkte bedeutet. Ein gemeinsames Graduiertenkolleg der Universitäten Bielefeld und Duisburg-Essen geht darüber hinaus: Es untersucht grenzüberschreitende Arbeitsmärkte als eigenständiges Phänomen. Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) richtet das Kolleg zur Qualifizierung von Wissenschaftler*innen in frühen Karrierephasen zum April 2024 ein. Das hat die DFG heute (08.11.2023) bekannt gegeben. Gefördert wird das Kolleg über fünf Jahre mit bis zu 6,7 Millionen Euro.
Sprecherin des Kollegs wird die Arbeits- und Wirtschaftssoziologin Professorin Dr. Ursula Mense-Petermann von der Universität Bielefeld, ihre Stellvertreterin wird Professorin Karen Shire PhD von der Universität Duisburg-Essen, deren Arbeitsschwerpunkt in der vergleichenden Arbeitsmarkt- und Asienforschung liegt.
Bisher dominiert nationale Sicht auf grenzüberschreitende Arbeitsmärkte
Von
Seeleuten über Pflegekräfte bis hin zu Programmierer*innen oder auch
Fleischzerlegern: Angehörige dieser Berufe sind vielfach im Ausland
tätig, ohne sich von ihrem Heimatland zu lösen. Ihre Arbeitsplätze sind
in transnationale Arbeitsmärkte eingebunden. Die Arbeitskräfte wechseln
in mehr oder weniger kurzen Abständen zwischen Heimat- und Arbeitsland
oder arbeiten im Homeoffice für eine Firma im Ausland.
„In der Forschung wird grenzüberschreitende Arbeit vor allem als Immigration in einen nationalen Arbeitsmarkt oder Emigration aus einem nationalen Arbeitsmarkt untersucht“, sagt die künftige Kollegsprecherin Ursula Mense-Petermann. „Das greift zu kurz. Grenzüberschreitende Arbeitsmärkte sind in ein eigenes Geflecht von länderübergreifenden Organisationen, Infrastrukturen und Institutionen eingebettet.“
„Uns treibt die große Frage an, wie eine soziale Ordnung der Arbeitsmärkte im transnationalen Maßstab überhaupt möglich ist“, sagt die stellvertretende Kollegsprecherin Karen Shire. Welche Akteure und Institutionen diese Ordnung herstellen und sich so auf die grenzüberschreitend tätigen Arbeitskräfte auswirken, das wird künftig im Kolleg erforscht.
Elf Professor*innen kooperieren in dem Graduiertenkolleg. Zu ihnen gehört außer den Forschenden der Universitäten Bielefeld und Duisburg-Essen auch eine Forscherin der Universität Osnabrück. Ihr gemeinsames Forschungsprogramm geht der Frage nach, wie ökonomisches Handeln auf Arbeitsmärkten in soziale Netzwerke, Institutionen oder politische Gefüge eingebettet ist. „Dafür setzen wir auf eine innovative interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit zwischen soziologischer und ökonomischer Arbeitsmarkt- und Migrationsforschung – ergänzt um Globalisierungs- und Transnationalisierungstheorie“, sagt Mense-Petermann.
In der ersten Förderphase nimmt das Graduiertenkolleg 22 Doktorand*innen und eine*n Postdoktorand*in auf. In ihren Forschungsprojekten analysieren sie grenzüberschreitende Arbeitsmärkte aus unterschiedlicher Sicht. So kann es etwa um die geografische Reichweite von Arbeitsmärkten gehen – diese reicht von Pendelmigration in Grenzregionen bis hin zu globalen Arbeitsmärkten, zum Beispiel im Fall von Fußballspieler*innen. Ebenfalls ein Aspekt ist das unterschiedliche Qualifikationsniveau der Arbeitskräfte – seien es ungelernte Arbeiter*innen in Landwirtschaft, Fleischverarbeitung und Logistik oder hochqualifizierte Fachkräfte wie Ingenieur*innen und Ärzt*innen. Erforscht wird zum Beispiel ebenfalls, dass grenzüberschreitende Arbeitsmärkte geschlechtsspezifisch und ethnisch geprägt sind.
Das neue Graduiertenkolleg trägt den Titel „Cross-border Labour Markets: Transnational Market Makers, Infrastructures, Institutions“ (Grenzüberschreitende Arbeitsmärkte: Transnationale „market makers“, Infrastrukturen, Institutionen, GRK 2951). Graduiertenkollegs sind Einrichtungen der Universitäten zur Förderung von Forschenden in frühen Karrierephasen, die von der DFG für maximal neun Jahre gefördert werden. Durch die Bewilligung des neuen Kollegs gehören künftig sechs Graduiertenkollegs zur Universität Bielefeld.
New paper by Sebastian Sattler and colleagues in the European Journal of Social Psychology about sleep-deprived or cognitively enhanced colleagues and effects on group performance
Sattler, S., Faber, N. Häusser, J. (2023, online first): Working with a sleep-deprived or a cognitively enhanced team member compromises motivation to contribute to group performance How Enhanced and Impaired Colleagues Affect Performance Norms and Work Motivation. European Journal of Social Psychology. ►LINK
Abstract
How does knowing another team member is cognitively impaired or enhanced affect people's motivation to contribute to the team's performance? Building on the Effects of Grouping on Impairments and Enhancements (GIE) framework, we conducted two between-subjects experiments (Ntotal = 2,352) with participants from a representative, nationwide sample of the working population in Germany. We found that another group member's impairment (sleep deprivation) and enhancement (taking enhancement drugs) lowered participants’ intentions to contribute to the team's performance. These effects were mediated by lowered perceived competence (enhancement and impairment) and warmth (only enhancement) of the other group member. The reason for being impaired or enhanced (altruistic vs. egoistic reason) moderated the indirect effect of the impairment on intended effort via warmth. Our results illustrate that people's work motivation is influenced by the psychophysiological states of other group members. Hence, the enhancement of one group member can have the paradoxical effect of impairing the performance of another.
[Weiterlesen]New Scale to Measure Sleep Problems and Impaired Daytime Functioning by Sebastian Sattler Published in ZIS – Open Access Repository for Measurment Instruments
Sattler, S., Seddig, D., Zerbini, G. (2023). Die Messung von Schlafproblemen und der Beeinträchtigung der Tagesform mittels der Athens Insomnia Scale for Non-Clinical Application (AIS-NCA) in deutscher und englischer Sprache. Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). https://doi.org/10.6102/zis329. ►LINK
ABSTRACT: The “Athens Insomnia Scale for Non-Clinical Application (AIS-NCA)” assesses problems with sleep (4 items) and with daytime functioning (3 items). It is also possible to use all seven items for a total score. The AIS-NCA has been developed for non-clinical applications and is available in both German (AIS-NCA-G) and English (AIS-NCA-E).
[Weiterlesen]New Paper on Stigmatization in the Context of COVID-19 by Sebastian Sattler Published in BMC Public Health
Sattler, S., Maskileyson, D., Racine, E., Davidov, E., Escande, A. (2023). Stigmatization in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Experiment Using Attribution Theory and the Familiarity Hypothesis. BMC Public Health 23: 521. ►LINK
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has created a global health crisis, leading to stigmatization and discriminatory behaviors against people who have contracted or are suspected of having contracted the virus. Yet the causes of stigmatization in the context of COVID-19 remain only partially understood. Using attribution theory, we examine to what extent attributes of a fictitious person affect the formation of stigmatizing attitudes towards this person, and whether suspected COVID-19 infection (vs. flu) intensifies such attitudes. We also use the familiarity hypothesis to explore whether familiarity with COVID-19 reduces stigma and whether it moderates the effect of a COVID-19 infection on stigmatization.
Methods
We conducted a multifactorial vignette survey experiment (28-design, i.e., NVignettes = 256) in Germany (NRespondents = 4,059) in which we experimentally varied signals and signaling events (i.e., information that may trigger stigma) concerning a fictitious person in the context of COVID-19. We assessed respondents’ cognitive (e.g., blameworthiness) and affective (e.g., anger) responses as well as their discriminatory inclinations (e.g., avoidance) towards the character. Furthermore, we measured different indicators of respondents’ familiarity with COVID-19.
Results
Results revealed higher levels of stigma towards people who were diagnosed with COVID-19 versus a regular flu. In addition, stigma was higher towards those who were considered responsible for their infection due to irresponsible behavior. Knowing someone who died from a COVID infection increased stigma. While higher self-reported knowledge about COVID-19 was associated with more stigma, higher factual knowledge was associated with less.
Conclusion
New Study by Philipp Simon Eisnecker, Martin Kroh, Simon Kühne "The role of generalized trust in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance"
Eisnecker PS, Kroh M, Kühne S (2022) The role of generalized trust in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0278854. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278854 ►LINK
Abstract
Immunization by vaccination is one of the most important tools for fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet in many countries, immunization campaigns have been hampered by vaccine hesitancy within the population. Building on the idea that vaccination decisions are embedded in the broader societal context, we study the role of generalized trust—the belief that most people can generally be trusted—in vaccine acceptance. Immunization campaigns face an inherent collective action problem: As all individuals benefit collectively from high immunization rates regardless of individual contribution, especially those with a low risk of severe COVID infection have an incentive to decide against the (perceived) costs and risks of vaccination. We argue that generalized trust may help to overcome this problem by encouraging the belief that cooperation for the common good is achievable and that those who cooperate are unlikely to be exploited by others. We further argue that the positive effect of generalized trust on vaccination decisions is weaker among individuals who are at higher risk of severe outcomes from the disease, as the collective action problem is less pronounced in this group. To test our predictions, we used data from the SOEP-CoV survey, which queried a representative probability sample of Germany’s population between January and February 2021 on topics connected to the pandemic. Using multiple logistic regression models, and in line with expectations, we found a positive and robust link between generalized trust and the willingness to accept vaccination as soon as offered. However, overall, our examination of heterogeneous effects does not unequivocally support the idea that the role of generalized trust varies according to individual COVID risk.
[Weiterlesen]Tag Hinweis
Auf dieser Seite werden nur die mit dem Tag [forschung] versehenen Blogeinträge gezeigt.
Wenn Sie alle Blogeinträge sehen möchten klicken Sie auf: Startseite