» Veröffentlicht am
30. September 2021
New study “Categorical Distinctions and Claims-Making: Opportunity, Agency, and Returns from Wage Negotiations” published in the American Sociological Review
In this
article, we
examine wage negotiations as a specific instance of
claims-making, predicting
that the capacity to make a claim is first a function of the
position, rather
than the person, and that lower-status actors—women, migrants,
fixed-term,
part-time, and unskilled workers—are all more likely to be in
positions where
negotiation is not possible. At the same time,
subordinate-status actors may be
less likely to make claims even where negotiation is possible,
and when they do
make wage claims they may receive lower or no returns to
negotiation. Analyses
of wage negotiations by more than 2,400 German employees largely
confirm these
theoretical expectations, although the patterns of opportunity,
agency, and
economic returns vary by categorical status. All low-status
actors are more
likely to be in jobs where negotiation is not possible. Women,
people in
lower-class jobs, and people with temporary contracts are less
likely to
negotiate even when given the opportunity. Regarding returns,
agency in wage
claims does not seem to improve the wages of women, migrants, or
working-class
individuals. The advice to “lean-in” will not substantially
lower wage
inequalities for everyone, although men who lean in do benefit
relative to men
who do not.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224211038507
»
Weiterlesen