<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153
-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/roller-ui/styles/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</title>
    <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/</link>
        <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"
                   href="https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/feed/entries/rss?cat=Streib_en"/>
    <description>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:23:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Apache Roller</generator>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/recently_published_more_spiritual_than</guid>
      <title>Recently Published: More Spiritual than Religious: Concurrent and Longitudinal Relations with Personality Traits, Mystical Experiences, and Other Individual Characteristics</title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/recently_published_more_spiritual_than</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <category>publication</category>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025938&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Chen, Z., Cowden, R. G., &amp;amp; Streib, H. (2023). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;More spiritual than
religious: Concurrent and longitudinal relations with personality traits,
mystical experiences, and other individual characteristics &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in
Psychology&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; 13&lt;/i&gt;, Article 1025938&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;margin:0cm;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:normal;&quot;&gt;People who self-identify as predominantly
spiritual constitute a considerable and well-established part of the religious
landscape in North America and Europe. Thus, further research is needed to
document predictors, correlates, and outcomes associated with self-identifying
primarily as a spiritual person. In the following set of studies, we contribute
to some of these areas using data from German and United States adults. Study 1
(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:normal;&quot;&gt;n&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:normal;&quot;&gt; = 3,491) used cross-sectional data to compare four
religious/spiritual (R/S) self-identity groups—more religious than spiritual
(MRTS), more spiritual than religious (MSTR), equally religious and spiritual
(ERAS), and neither religious nor spiritual (NRNS)—on sociodemographic
characteristics and a range of criterion variables (i.e., Big Five personality
traits, psychological well-being, generativity, mystical experiences, religious
schemata). In Study 2 (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:normal;&quot;&gt;n&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:normal;&quot;&gt; = 751), we applied the analytic template for
outcome-wide longitudinal designs to examine associations of the four R/S
self-identifications with a range of subsequent outcomes (assessed
approximately 3 years later) that were largely comparable to the criterion
variables assessed in Study 1. The cross-sectional and longitudinal findings
from these complementary studies provide further evidence of differences
between these four categories of R/S self-identification, including strong
evidence in both studies of an association between the MSTR self-identity and
mysticism.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13.5pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/12_11_2022_baltimore_research</guid>
      <title>Baltimore: Research Teams from Bielefeld University, UTC, and UNCC at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion. </title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/12_11_2022_baltimore_research</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Während des jährlichen Treffens der Society for the Scientific Study of 
Religion (SSSR) in Baltimore, MD, USA im November 2022 konnte sich das 
internationale Team erstmal wieder in persona zusammenfinden! Von links 
nach rechts: Matthew Durham (University of Tennessee at Chattanooga 
(UTC)), Dr. Barbara Keller (Universität Bielefeld), Prof. Dr. Heinz 
Streib (Universität Bielefeld), Dr. Ramona Bullik (Universität 
Bielefeld), William Andrews (UTC), Prof. Dr. Ralph W. Hood (UTC), Dr. 
Christopher Silver (University of the South, Sewanee), und Dr. Zhuo Job 
Chen (University of North Carolina at Charlotte).&lt;/p&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/now_in_open_access_2009</guid>
      <title>Now in Open Access: 2009 Deconversion Book </title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/now_in_open_access_2009</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666604393&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666604393&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Streib, H., Hood, R. W., Keller, B., Csöff, R.-M., &amp;amp; Silver, C.
(2009). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;Deconversion. Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural
research in Germany and the United States of America&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;. Vandenhoeck &amp;amp;
Ruprecht. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.vr-elibrary.de/doi/reader/10.13109/9783666568688&quot;&gt;[Download]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 style=&quot;margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:normal;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;This book presents case studies and empirical data of a phenomenon which
increasingly gains popularity in Western societies: deconversion. There is, the
authors argue, no better word than deconversion to describe processes of
disengagement from religious orientations, because these have much in common
with conversion; Termination of membership may eventually be the final step of
deconversion, but it involves biographical and psychological dynamics which can
and need to be reconstructed by qualitative approaches and analyzed by
quantitative instruments. In the Bielefeld-based Cross-Cultural Study on
Deconversion, disengagement processes from a variety of religious orientations
in the U.S.A. and in Germany were examined, ranging from well-established
religious organizations to new religious and fundamentalist groups. Nearly
1,200 persons participated in the study and were interviewed from 2002 to 2005.
In the focus of the study are 100 deconverts from the U.S.A. and from Germany
who were examined with narrative interviews, faith development interviews and
an extensive questionnaire. For case study elaboration, the study followed a
research design with an innovative triangulation of qualitative and
quantitative data. Four chapters, corresponding to four types of deconversion,
present 21 case studies. The highlights of the research project are new data on
spirituality - the deconverts in particular appear to prefer a &amp;quot;more
spiritual than religious&amp;quot; self-identification - and in-depth analyses of a
variety of deconversion narratives with special focus on personality factors,
motivation, attitudes, religious development, psychological well-being and
growth, religious fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism. The results
of this project which was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft are of
special relevance for counselling and pastoral care, for religious education
and for people concerned with administration and management of religious groups
and churches, but also for a wider audience interested in contemporary changes
in the religious fields in the U.S.A. and Germany.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/article_a_faithful_journey_following</guid>
      <title>Article:  A Faithful Journey: Following a Married Couple’s Religious Trajectory over the Adult Lifespan</title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/article_a_faithful_journey_following</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel13080673&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Bullik,
R. (2022). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;A
Faithful Journey: Following a Married Couple’s Religious Trajectory over the
Adult Lifespan. &lt;i&gt;Religions&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;13&lt;/i&gt;(8), 673. MDPI AG.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;Abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;: This article addresses the
question of how religious narrative identity and subjective religiosity change
over the course of 15 years. The cases portrayed are deconverts who have
changed their religious affiliations multiple times. It was carved out what led
to their deconversion and what remains as a core of their faith after they have
turned away from organized religion for good. Interviews were conducted at
three time points and were analyzed using content analysis. It became clear
that the needs and expectations of the two individuals differ highly, as well
as the reasons for turning away from a religious community; yet, what could be
identified as a common core in this joint faithful journey is their need to
live their religiosity, now in a private setting.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/new_grants_for_faith_development</guid>
      <title>New grants for faith development research</title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/new_grants_for_faith_development</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Dec 2021 16:41:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <category>faith</category>
          <category>faith_development</category>
          <category>group-focused_emnity</category>
          <category>religion</category>
          <category>xenosophia</category>
          <description>

&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:24pt;&quot;&gt;New grants from the John
Templeton Foundation (JTF) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) enable the
research teams at Bielefeld University, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga,
and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte to continue with our longitudinal
investigation of faith development in the years 2022 to 2024. Here is an
Executive Summary:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:24pt;&quot;&gt;The questions that this
project will have the potential to answer is, whether, how, why, and when in
their lifetime individuals are changing their religion and worldview. We
interpret such changes as migrations between developmentally ordered religious
styles and religious types. While in our current project we could demonstrate
that there is faith development and initially identify predictors and outcomes,
this project has a focus on two particularly interesting outcomes of faith
development: (a) changes in people’s images of God and, in more general and
inclusive terms, their symbolization of transcendence, and (b) their changes in
prejudice and, with reference to the philosophy of the Alien, their responses
to the Strange. We assume that faith development results in a narrative
identity that affords a wise and humble response to the Strange we call
xenosophia. This research is a contribution to answer these and other key
questions using longitudinal data from Germany and the U.S.A. that were gathered
in previous and current multi-method projects, which were based on faith
development interviews (FDI) and questionnaire data (which include measures for
personality, well-being, religious schema, mysticism, etc.). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:24pt;&quot;&gt;This new project
phase continues this research into a fourth wave of field work and will add another &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;
= 460 (50% US and 50% German) longitudinal re-interviews with the FDI. This
will furnish longitudinal analyses with sufficient statistical power. In
addition, we survey general population samples of &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 1,250 in both
U.S.A. and Germany using our questionnaire, which now includes scales for
intellectual humility, God images, and questions for xenophobia, anti-Semitism
and Islamophobia and other prejudice. Thus, we may be able to relate our
questions of religious change to a larger population context, and demonstrate
the contribution of faith development research to psychological investigation
in domains such as wisdom, God images, and prejudice.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://ekvv.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/resource/JTF-DFG_Logos.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Logos JTF DFG&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;bottom&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/new_book_deconversion_revisited</guid>
      <title>New Book: Deconversion Revisited</title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/new_book_deconversion_revisited</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Dec 2021 20:47:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <category>deconversion</category>
          <category>leaving_religion</category>
          <category>religion</category>
          <category>religious_change</category>
          <category>spirituality</category>
          <description>&lt;div align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Streib, H., Keller, B., Bullik, R., Steppacher, A., Silver, C. F., Durham, M., Barker, S. B., &amp;amp; Hood Jr., R. W. (2022). Deconversion Revisited. Biographical Studies and Psychometric Analyses Ten Years Later. Brill Germany/Vandenhoeck &amp;amp; Ruprecht. &lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666568688&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666568688&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This book is &lt;span style=&quot;background-color:rgb(0, 255, 84);&quot;&gt;Open Access&lt;/span&gt; and available &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.vr-elibrary.de/doi/book/10.13109/9783666568688&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-GB&quot;&gt;Abstract. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-GB&quot;&gt;Deconversion Revisited&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-GB&quot;&gt; is the follow-up book to &lt;i&gt;Deconversion&lt;/i&gt; (2009), which examined
disengagement processes from a variety of religious backgrounds in the USA and
in Germany. After more than ten years, 45 participants were reinterviewed with
the Faith Development Interview (FDI).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;With this new book we are revisiting the question of
religious change after more than a decade since our original study on Deconversion
(Streib, Hood, Keller, Csöff, &amp;amp; Silver, 2009). Back then, we were able to
analyze the survey data of twelve hundred participants from the USA and Germany
as well as conducting personal interviews with 272 of them. This previous study
brought surprising findings to light such as the importance of ‘spirituality’
as self-description of deconverts, their considerably higher stages/styles in
faith development, and the great variety of paths they took when migrating
within the religious field. A variety we captured in a typology of four types
in terms of how their searches were narrated: &lt;i&gt;pursuit of autonomy&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;life-long
quests and late revisions&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;barred from paradise&lt;/i&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;finding a
new frame of reference&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;In this new book, we document how a selection of these
stories continued. What has changed since the first interview? Are the
deconverts still “more spiritual than religious”? How did their faith
development continue? Does the typology of four types still fit? After more
than ten years, we reinterviewed 45 participants from the original deconversion
study with the Faith Development Interview (FDI). During the FDI the
participants have shared their subjective retrospectives on their faith
development and their lives for the second time now. This enables us to investigate
changes in structures of faith development, as well as content and narratives.
We explore the narrative identities of our participants by taking an in-depth perspective:
We studied the development of ten selected longitudinal case studies that
present the lifespan from early adulthood to old age. Thus the study published
in this book is one of only a few longitudinal studies on deconversion in the
past ten years. It demonstrates that deconversion is a dynamic biographical
process that eventually has long-term, slowly changing causes and consequences.&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt;line-height:107%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/rticle_faith_development_as_change</guid>
      <title>Article: Faith  development as change in religious types.</title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/rticle_faith_development_as_change</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000440&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Streib,
H., Chen, Z. J., &amp;amp; Hood, R. W. (2021). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000440&quot;&gt;Faith development as change in religious types:
Results from three-wave longitudinal data with faith development interviews. &lt;i&gt;Psychology
of Religion and Spirituality&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; online-first&lt;/i&gt;, 1-10.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000440&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qrcb2&quot;&gt;(Link to post-print)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;Faith, as a way of how people understand God and
the world and make or discover meaning in their life, is characterized by
individual differences and changes over the lifetime. Our research investigates
these changes over the lifespan in terms of hierarchically ordered types that
are the elements in our developmental model, which is a critical advancement
and modification of Fowler’s theory of faith development. This study is the
first to investigate whether there is development in faith over the adult
lifespan and to identify predictors of developmental change. Our mixed-method
design used three-wave longitudinal data (mean lag time 10.47 years from Wave 1
to Wave 3). A sample of N = 75 participants were interviewed with the faith
development interview three times and each time answered comprehensive
questionnaires. Results evidenced faith development over the lifespan: a
majority in our data moved to a higher type, while change to a lower type did
occur. Openness to experience and the religious schema truth of text and
teachings were potential antecedents for faith development.&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/a_review_by_herbert_will</guid>
      <title>A Review by Herbert Will for Barbara Keller&amp;#39;s Toward a binocular vision of religion: Psychoanalytic and psychometric perspectives</title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/a_review_by_herbert_will</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:10:53 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <description>

&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;This is a
decidedly inventive and innovative study. The author does a threefold
crossover: between psychoanalysis and academic psychology, between nomothetic
and idiothetic research, and between North American and European cultures of
knowledge. This interdisciplinary approach in the psychology of religion works
out well, which does not go without saying. The complexity of the topic of
religion, which becomes evident, could easily lead to an unapprehended clutter
of concepts and to arbitrary setting of thematic priorities. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;After an
introduction which gives orientation and clarification of concepts Keller
discusses aspects of religious development, of religion and personality, and of
handling religious issues in psychotherapy. In all chapters exemplary quantitative
and qualitative approaches and case studies are presented. This offers vistas,
which broaden the view of the reader and remove method-related blinkers. Barbara
Keller can do this, because she has demonstrated profound knowledge of theory
and practice as empirical researcher as well as practicing psychoanalyst&lt;i&gt;.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;Regarding my
own field of expertise, the psychoanalytic psychology of religion, I find Barbara
Keller´s work markedly well informed and well-oriented. She uses the
psychoanalytic perspective in ways that develop it further and that lead to
innovative results. Her readers will enjoy that her writing is clear and easy without
compromising scientific differentiation. &lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Herbert Will&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Dr. med., Mag. theol., Psychiater und Psychoanalytiker (M.A.
in theology, psychiatrist and psychoanalyst)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Joint Editor PSYCHE, Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse und ihre
Anwendungen (Psyche – Journal for psychoanalysis and its applications) &lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/anika_steppacher_received_award_for</guid>
      <title>Anika Steppacher Received Award for Outstanding Theses from the German Sociological Association (DGS)</title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/anika_steppacher_received_award_for</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:01:53 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://ekvv.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/resource/IMG_20200922_172038815%7E2%281%29.jpg&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;bottom&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;Anika Steppacher, graduate assistant in Prof. Streib’s
research project on Longitudinal Study of Religious Development in Germany and U.S.A.,
has received the &lt;a href=&quot;https://soziologie.de/dgs/preise/herausragende-abschlussarbeiten&quot;&gt;DGS award for outstanding theses 2020&lt;/a&gt; for her
Master thesis entitled “Von allen Wahrheiten die Beste” (The best of all
Truths). In her thesis, she studied esotericism in its subjective functions as
an all-encompassing worldview. She wrote her thesis with data from &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.uni-bielefeld.de/theologie/forschung/religionsforschung/forschung/streib/aktuelle_forschung.html&quot;&gt;this research
project&lt;/a&gt;. Anika Steppacher has been invited to publish the results of
her study in the DGS journal SOZIOLOGIE.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;

.htmtableborders, .htmtableborders td, .htmtableborders th {border : 1px dashed lightgrey ! important;} 

html, body { border: 0px;  background-color: #ffffff; } 
span.macro, span.macro ul, span.macro div, span.macro p {background : #CCCCCC;}






&lt;/p&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/article_categorizing_people_by_their</guid>
      <title>Article: “Categorizing People by Their Preference for Religious Styles”</title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/article_categorizing_people_by_their</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <description>

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Streib,
H., Chen, Z. J., &amp;amp; Hood, R. W. (2020). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;Categorizing people by their preference for
religious styles: Four types derived from evaluation of faith development
interviews. &lt;i&gt;International Journal for the Psychology of Religion&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; 30&lt;/i&gt;(2),
112-127. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&amp;quot;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;This article presents a typology that categorizes
people according to their profile of religious styles which concerns, among
other things, the sources where they derive validity and stability, when
confronted with religious and existential questions or inter-religious
challenges. The modeling of this typology is an empirical complement to Streib’s
model of religious styles which, in turn, is a critical advancement of Fowler’s
faith development theory. Data are religious style assignments to the answers
on the 25 questions in the Faith Development Interview (FDI), which has been
administered to 677 participants in the United States and Germany. We present
results based on a theory-driven approach to determine a person’s religious
type by incorporating frequencies of religious style assignments from the
evaluation of their FDI. We also explored convergent validity with latent class
analysis and a machine-learning algorithm. Results based on three samples
converged on four religious types: Substantially Ethnocentric, Predominantly
Conventional, Predominantly Individuative-Reflective, and Emerging Dialogical-Xenosophic
types. We reported the profiles of the four types with reference to group
differences on religious schemata and openness to experience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/new_book_release_xenosophia_and</guid>
      <title>New Book: Xenosophia and Religion</title>
      <link>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie/entry/new_book_release_xenosophia_and</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 4 Aug 2018 08:19:56 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>Streib_en</category>
      <handle>https://blogs.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/theologie</handle>
      <name>Aktuelles aus Theologie und Religionsforschung</name>
      <is_active_blog>false</is_active_blog>
          <category>;</category>
          <category>xenosophia</category>
          <atom:summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
Streib, H. &amp;amp; Klein, C. (2018). &lt;i&gt;Xenosophia and Religion: Biographical
 and Statistical Paths for a Culture of Welcome&lt;/i&gt;. Cham: Springer 
International Publishing Switzerland.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319745633&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Available as e-book and printed book &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319745633&quot;&gt;https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319745633&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</atom:summary>          <description>&lt;p&gt;Available as e-book and printed book &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319745633&quot;&gt;https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319745633&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319745633&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;This book presents results from a research project at Bielefeld University. See more on our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/(en)/theologie/forschung/religionsforschung/forschung/streib/abgeschlossene_projekte/xenosophie.html&quot;&gt;website for this project&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;</description>    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>